H. Kapginlian
Veda’s Journal of English Language and Literature (JOELL)• Vol. 12, No. 2 (April-June 2025), pp. 8–17• ISSN: 2349-9788
DOI: 10.54513/JOELL.2024.12202 ↗
Linguistics••15 min read•Language Focus: Simte

Numerals in Kaipeng and Simte

A comparative linguistic investigation across Old Kuki and Northern Kuki-Chin branches

H. Kapginlian
Lorina D. Tariang (Assam University, Silchar) & H. Kapginlian (NEHU, Shillong)North-Eastern Hill University (NEHU), Shillong

Abstract

Kaipeng and Simte belong to the Kuki-Chin sub-group of the Tibeto-Burman language family. Kaipeng belongs to the Old Kuki sub-group while Simte belongs to the Northern Kuki-Chin group (Grierson 1903). Kaipeng is spoken in Tripura by approximately 15,000 speakers. According to the 2011 Census, Simte constitutes a population of 6,728. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the numeral systems in both languages in the realm of cardinals, ordinals, fractionals, multiplicatives, distributives, and approximate numerals.

Keywords:ApproximateDistributiveFractionalKaipengSimteKuki-ChinOld Kuki

1. Introduction

Kaipeng is a language spoken in the North-Eastern state of Tripura, concentrated in four districts: Khowai, Gomati, North Tripura, and Sepahijala. The total number of Kaipeng speakers in Tripura is approximately 15,000. The term 'Kaipeng' represents both the language and the people. Etymologically, it derives from 'kai' ('to lead') and 'peng' ('another way or path'), thus signifying 'leading someone towards another path'. Linguistically, Kaipeng is a sub-group of Halam, classified under Old Kuki along with languages like Kom, Bete, Aimol, Langrong, Anal, and Chothe (Thurgood 2003).

Simte is also a Kuki-Chin language inhabiting the North-Eastern part of India, predominantly concentrated in Churachandpur and Pherzawl districts of Manipur (Hangluah, 2019). According to Suantak and Singh (2011), Simte speakers are also scattered across Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Assam. The word 'Simte' combines 'sim' ('southern region') and 'te' ('people'). It is classified under Northern Kuki-Chin alongside Paite, Zou, Vaiphei, Gangte, and Thadou. Both languages exhibit pronoun dropping and SOV word order.

Numerals represent a critical aspect of morphosyntax, reflecting collective cognitive categorization. Younger generations increasingly favour English numerals due to Western education, rendering indigenous counting systems especially vulnerable to extinction (Saikia and Mamta, 2020).

2. Literature Review

Hammarström (2009) posits that numerals are normed spoken expressions used to denote the precise quantity of objects within a particular social context. Pioneer comparative surveys by Grierson (1904) documented numerals in Paite, Lushai, and Thadou, but omitted Kaipeng and Simte.

Previous grammatical sketches of Simte by Singh (2009) and Champeon (2019) cataloged cardinal and ordinal forms, but failed to investigate distributive, fractional, and approximate numerals. For Kaipeng, prior literature showed a complete absence of descriptive research on numeration. This paper represents the first comparative linguistic investigation of numerals between Old Kuki and Northern Kuki-Chin varieties.

3.1 Basic Cardinal Numbers (1–10)

Both Kaipeng and Simte operate on a base-10 decimal counting system. Basic numbers from one to ten constitute the primary lexical roots.

In Kaipeng, the suffix '-ka' is obligatory on all basic cardinal numbers. In Simte, on the other hand, numerals occur as bare monosyllabic roots, with the sole exception of the disyllabic 'sagiʔ' ('seven'):

Table 1: Basic Cardinal Numerals in Kaipeng and Simte (1 to 10)

ValueKaipeng (Old Kuki)Simte (Northern Kuki-Chin)Cognate & Phonological Notes
1kʰat-kakhatCognate root (*kʰat); Kaipeng adds '-ka' suffix
2ni-kaniɁCognate root (*ni) with final glottal stop in Simte
3tʰum-katʰumCognate root (*tʰum) across both branches
4li-kaliCognate root (*b-li)
5rəŋa-kaŋaKaipeng preserves archaic pre-initial 'rə-'
6ru-kagupOnset alternation: Kaipeng 'r-' vs. Simte velar 'g-'
7səri-kasagiɁDisyllabic development in both branches
8riat-kagiatRegular r- / g- liquid-to-velar correspondence
9kua-kakuaCognate root (*kua)
10sɔm-kasɔmCommon Kuki-Chin base ten root (*sɔm)

3.2.1 Additive Compound Numerals (11–19)

Numbers from eleven to nineteen are additive compounds formed by combining the base ten ('sɔm') with digits one through nine.

In Kaipeng, numbers are joined using the conjunctive particle 'lei'. In Simte, the coordinator 'leʔ' is employed. The syntactic formula is: [10] + [CONJ] + [1–9]:

Table 2: Additive Compound Numerals (11 to 19)

ValueArithmeticKaipeng (lei)Simte (leʔ)
1110 + 1sɔm lei kʰatkasɔm leɁ khat
1210 + 2sɔm lei nikasɔm leɁ niɁ
1310 + 3sɔm lei tʰumkasɔm leɁ thum
1410 + 4sɔm lei likasɔm leɁ li
1510 + 5sɔm lei rəŋakasɔm leɁ ŋa
1610 + 6sɔm lei rukasɔm leɁ gup
1710 + 7sɔm lei sərikasɔm leɁ sagiɁ
1810 + 8sɔm lei riatkasɔm leɁ giat
1910 + 9sɔm lei kuakasɔm leɁ kua

3.2.2.1 Lower Multiplicative Compound Numerals (Decades 10–90)

Decades from ten to ninety are formed multiplicatively by multiplying the base ten by digits one through nine [10 × N]:

Table 3: Lower Multiplicative Compound Numerals (10 to 90)

ValueArithmeticKaipengSimteGloss
1010 × 1sɔm kasɔmten
2010 × 2sɔm nikasɔm niɁtwenty
3010 × 3sɔm thumkasɔm thumthirty
4010 × 4sɔm likasɔm liforty
5010 × 5sɔm rəŋakasɔm ŋafifty
6010 × 6sɔm rukasɔm gupsixty
7010 × 7sɔm sərikasɔm sagiɁseventy
8010 × 8sɔm riatkasɔm giateighty
9010 × 9sɔm kuakasɔm kuaninety

3.2.2.2 Higher Multiplicative Compound Numerals: Hundreds (100–900)

Hundreds are derived by multiplying the base hundred ('rəza' in Kaipeng, 'za' in Simte) by basic numerals one through nine [100 × N]:

Table 4: Higher Multiplicative Compound Numerals (Hundreds)

ValueArithmeticKaipeng (rəza)Simte (za)Gloss
100100 × 1rəza kaza khatone hundred
200100 × 2rəza nikaza niɁtwo hundred
300100 × 3rəza tʰumkaza tʰumthree hundred
400100 × 4rəza likaza lifour hundred
500100 × 5rəza rəŋakaza ŋafive hundred
600100 × 6rəza rukaza gupsix hundred
700100 × 7rəza sərikaza sagiɁseven hundred
800100 × 8rəza riatkaza giateight hundred
900100 × 9rəza kuakaza kuanine hundred

3.2.2.3 Higher Multiplicative Compound Numerals: Thousands (1,000–9,000)

Thousands are formed by multiplying the base thousand ('saŋ') with digits one through nine [1000 × N]:

Table 5: Higher Multiplicative Compound Numerals (Thousands)

ValueArithmeticKaipeng (saŋ)Simte (saŋ)Gloss
1,0001000 × 1saŋ kasaŋ khatone thousand
2,0001000 × 2saŋ nikasaŋ niɁtwo thousand
3,0001000 × 3saŋ tʰumkasaŋ tʰumthree thousand
4,0001000 × 4saŋ likasaŋ lifour thousand
5,0001000 × 5saŋ rəŋakasaŋ ŋafive thousand
6,0001000 × 6saŋ rukasaŋ gupsix thousand
7,0001000 × 7saŋ sərikasaŋ sagiɁseven thousand
8,0001000 × 8saŋ riatkasaŋ giateight thousand
9,0001000 × 9saŋ kuakasaŋ kuanine thousand

3.2.3 Multiplicative-cum-Additive Compound Numerals

Numerals such as 21–29, 31–39, 101–109, and 1001–1009 combine multiplication and addition.

In Kaipeng, the conjunctive particle is dropped: a base-10 multiplier applies sequentially across stems (e.g. 'sɔm tʰum kʰatnika' for 32). In Simte, the coordinator 'leʔ' remains overt throughout the construction (e.g. 'sɔmniɁ leɁ niɁ' for 22):

Table 6: Multiplicative-cum-Additive Compounds in Kaipeng and Simte

NumberKaipeng ConstructionSimte ConstructionEnglish Gloss
32sɔm tʰum kʰatnikasɔmniɁ leɁ niɁthirty-two
43sɔm lik kʰat tʰumkasɔmli leɁ tʰumforty-three
52sɔm rəŋak kʰatnikasɔm ŋa leɁ niɁfifty-two
72sɔm sərik kʰatnikasɔm sagiɁ leɁ niɁseventy-two
303rəzatʰum kʰattʰumkazathum leɁ thumthree hundred three
404rəzalik kʰatlikazali leɁ lifour hundred four
5,005saŋrəŋak arəŋakkasaŋŋa leɁ ŋafive thousand five
6,006saŋruk arukkasaŋgup leɁ gupsix thousand six

4. Ordinal Numerals

Ordinal numbers in both languages employ morphological affixes. In Kaipeng, the circumfix 'a-...-na' is utilized, with the prefix 'a-' dropped on 'first' ('kʰatka-na'). In Simte, ordinals are derived uniformly by suffixing '-na' directly to the basic numeral:

Table 7: Ordinal Numerals Comparison

RankKaipeng (a-...-na)Simte (-na)Gloss
1stkʰatka-nakhat-nafirst
2nda-nika-naniɁ-nasecond
3rda-tʰumka-nathum-nathird

5. Fractional Numerals

Fractional values express division of wholes. In Kaipeng, 'half' is denoted by the morpheme 'bɔŋ', while in Simte it is realized by 'kim'.

For 'one and half', Kaipeng combines 'kʰat-ka' with 'bɔŋ-ka', whereas Simte joins them with the conjunction 'leʔ' ('khat leɁ kim'). In 'one-tenth', both languages insert 'a' between ten and one:

Table 8: Fractional Numerals Comparison

FractionKaipengSimteMorphological Pattern
1/2bɔŋkakim khatRoot variation: 'bɔŋ' vs. 'kim'
1 1/2kʰat-ka bɔŋ-kakhat leɁ kimKaipeng double '-ka' vs. Simte 'leʔ'
1/10sɔmkhat-a-kʰatkasɔm-a-khatGenitive/relational connector '-a-'

6. Multiplicative Numerals ('Times / Frequencies')

Multiplicative numerals ('once', 'twice', 'thrice') share the cognate morpheme 'vei'. However, they exhibit opposite syntactic affixation orders:

In Kaipeng, 'vei-' is prefixed to the cardinal stem: 'vei-ka' ('once'), 'vei-nika' ('twice'), 'vei-tʰumka' ('thrice'). In Simte, 'vei' is suffixed: 'khat-vei' ('once'), 'niɁ-vei' ('twice'), 'tʰum-vei' ('thrice'):

Table 9: Multiplicative Numerals (Prefixation vs. Suffixation)

FrequencyKaipeng (Prefix vei-)Simte (Suffix -vei)Syntactic Contrast
Oncevei-kakhat-veiPrefixal vs. Suffixal positioning
Twicevei-nikaniɁ-veiPrefixal vs. Suffixal positioning
Thricevei-tʰumkatʰum-veiPrefixal vs. Suffixal positioning

7. Distributive Numerals ('Each / One by One')

Distributive numerals ('one each', 'two each') reflect distinct morphological mechanisms between the two languages.

Kaipeng derives distributives via partial reduplication of the cardinal stem ('kʰat kʰatka', 'anik nika', 'atʰum tʰumka'). Simte, conversely, uses the lexical postpositional distributive marker 'chiat' ('khat chiat', 'niɁ chiat', 'thum chiat'):

Table 10: Distributive Numerals (Reduplication vs. Lexical Marker)

DistributionKaipeng (Reduplication)Simte (Particle chiat)Typological Strategy
One eachkʰat kʰatkakhat chiatPartial reduplication vs. particle
Two eachanik nikaniɁ chiatPartial reduplication vs. particle
Three eachatʰum tʰumkathum chiatPartial reduplication vs. particle

8. Approximate Numerals ('About / Approximately')

Approximate numerals express numerical estimations. Kaipeng suffixes '/ʦaŋ/' to the cardinal base, whereas Simte suffixes '-vel':

Table 11: Approximate Numerals Comparison

ApproximationKaipeng (Suffix -ʦaŋ)Simte (Suffix -vel)English Gloss
~10sɔmka ʦaŋsɔm-velabout ten
~100rəzaka ʦaŋza khat-velabout a hundred
~2,000saŋnikka ʦaŋza niɁ-velabout two thousand

9. Conclusion

A comparative analysis of the numeral systems in Kaipeng and Simte reveals both remarkable genetic continuity and systematic morphological divergence across the Old Kuki and Northern Kuki-Chin branches.

Both languages employ base-10 decimal systems and cognate roots (*kʰat, *ni, *tʰum, *li, *kua, *sɔm). In cardinals, Kaipeng marks bare numbers with '-ka', while Simte uses bare monosyllables. Compounding links higher numbers via 'lei' (Kaipeng) and 'leʔ' (Simte).

Most striking is the mirror-image position of the multiplicative marker 'vei': prefixed in Kaipeng ('vei-nika') but suffixed in Simte ('niɁ-vei'). While Kaipeng marks distributivity through morphological reduplication, Simte relies on the postposition 'chiat'. Documenting these systems is urgent as indigenous counting gives way to Western numerals.

References & Archival Sources

  • Champeon, Connie. (2019). Simte Writers' Handbook. U.S.A: Bibles International.
  • Directorate of Census Operations. (2011). Census of India, Series 15 Manipur Part VIII (II). Imphal: Director of Census Operations.
  • Grierson, George A. (1904). Linguistic Survey of India: Volume III, Part III. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  • Hammarström, Harald. (2009). Unsupervised Learning of Morphology and the Languages of the World. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gothenburg.
  • Hangluah, T.K. Lal. (2019). 'The Simte.' In 60 Diamond Jubilee Simte Tribe Council Souvenir, pp. 16–17. Churachandpur: STC Publication.
  • Saikia, A. & Mamta, K. (2020). 'A Comparative Analysis of Kuki-Chin Numeral Systems.' In V.M. Subramanian (ed.), Working Papers on Linguistics and Literature, pp. 90–97. Coimbatore: Bharathiar University.
  • Singh, Naorem Brojen. (2009). Simte Grammar. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Linguistics, Manipur University, Imphal.
  • Singh, S.K. & Suantak, K.S.K. (2011). 'Epilogue.' In Linguistic Ecology: Manipur, pp. 285–292. Guwahati: EBH Publishers.
  • Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (2003). The Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Routledge.

Cite This Publication

APA 7th & BibTeX
APA 7th Edition:
Tariang, L. D., & Kapginlian, H. (2025). Numerals in Kaipeng and Simte. Veda’s Journal of English Language and Literature (JOELL), 12(2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.54513/JOELL.2024.12202
BibTeX Entry:
@article{tariang2025numerals,
  title     = {Numerals in Kaipeng and Simte},
  author    = {Tariang, Lorina D. and Kapginlian, H.},
  journal   = {Veda's Journal of English Language and Literature (JOELL)},
  volume    = {12},
  number    = {2},
  pages     = {8--17},
  year      = {2025},
  issn      = {2349-9788},
  doi       = {10.54513/JOELL.2024.12202},
  url       = {https://lianhangluah.com/papers/numerals-kaipeng-simte.pdf}
}